Talk:Acceleration

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Lead image for acceleration page

Theory. The lead image should draw the reader in and help make the subject appealing.

Lead image on Wikipedia Lead image on Infogalactic
Acceleration
Gravity gravita grave.gif
In the absence of air resistance and thus terminal velocity, a falling ball would continue to accelerate.
Common symbols
a
SI unit m/s2, m•s-2, m s-2
Acceleration
Blown Altered.JPG
A machine designed to maximize acceleration at all cost, beginning from a standstill.
Common symbols
a
SI unit m/s2, m·s-2, m s-2

Slippery language, slippery math

This is an endemic problem in physics, with the Acceleration page being merely one example. Speed is conflated with velocity in several places. Notation changes from one section to the next and from one image to the next. Crucial concepts go missing. Rectified (talk) 15:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Relation to relativity

Copied over from WP article. Example of odd, vague, and slippery language. Relativity does not accommodate acceleration. I change "speed of light" to "velocity of light" in this section to emphasize that the direction is crucial to the discussion.

Special relativity

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

The special theory of relativity describes the behavior of objects traveling relative to other objects at speeds approaching that of light in a vacuum. Newtonian mechanics is exactly revealed to be an approximation to reality, valid to great accuracy at lower speeds. As the relevant speeds increase toward the speed of light, acceleration no longer follows classical equations.

As speeds approach that of light, the acceleration produced by a given force decreases, becoming infinitesimally small as light speed is approached; an object with mass can approach this speed asymptotically, but never reach it. [emphasis added]

General relativity

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Unless the state of motion of an object is known, it is totally impossible to distinguish whether an observed force is due to gravity or to acceleration—gravity and inertial acceleration have identical effects. Albert Einstein called this the principle of equivalence, and said that only observers who feel no force at all—including the force of gravity—are justified in concluding that they are not accelerating.[1] Rectified (talk) 15:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)


Wiki stats for acceleration page

About 2000 pages link to Acceleration

View Totals last 90 days: 130,432 (1,449/day)

Number of page watchers 148

Number of page watchers who visited recent edits 18

Number of redirects to this page 22

Date of page creation 21:39, 3 November 2001

Date of latest edit 06:28, 27 October 2016

Total number of edits 2,076

Recent number of edits (within past 30 days) 8

Recent number of distinct authors 5

Minor edits 656 (31.6 %)

Anonymous edits 943 (45.4 %)

Different users 1198

Anonymous users 662 (55.3 %)

Edits per user 1.73

First edit November 03 2001 21:39 (14 years and 364 days ago)

Last edit October 27 2016 06:28 (3 days ago)

Edits per day 0.38

Edits per month 11.38

Edits per year 138.52

Current size 18,326 Byte

  1. Brian Greene, The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time, and the Texture of Reality, page 67. Vintage ISBN 0-375-72720-5